1. Legal exposure for public expression
elevated- The host agreement, signed in June and made public on 25 September, says participants must “respect Türkiye’s laws and regulations and not to interfere in its internal affairs.” Whether conduct breaches this is “evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with close coordination between the country’s authorities and the UN climate change body.” [3]
- The same agreement gives accredited attendees immunity for statements, writings, and actions connected to the conference, reaching beyond the UN-run Blue Zone in certain circumstances and continuing after the summit. The UN can waive it where it believes immunity would “impede the course of justice.” [3]
- An official reportedly told lawmakers on 16 July that authorities would not “offer explicit security guarantees for public protests outside UN-controlled zones.” The Blue Zone is under UN jurisdiction; the Green Zone is under Turkish administrative authority. [5] The COP31 president-designate has said his team will “try to meet” activists’ requests. [4]
- Precedent: before the NATO summit in Ankara on 7–8 July, overnight raids on 22–23 June detained at least 209 people, later counted at 225, including activists, lawyers, an academic, and a journalist, on terrorism-law allegations. Ankara then banned all public assemblies from 28 June to 10 July. [7][8]
- The precedent reached Antalya. Its governorate banned protests, marches, and similar events across the province from 1 to 9 July because of the Ankara summit. [24]
- The UK FCDO notes that insulting the President or Atatürk is a criminal offence, that it applies to online comments “no matter where you were or when you posted them,” and that penalties run from six months to three years. [10]
Rating: elevated for public expression, moderate for other attendees. Confidence: moderate. The facts are well sourced; whether the NATO pattern repeats for COP31 is our inference.